Self-discipline and the Sense of Austerity in the ruling party.
When the country passes through the crises, people looks towards their leaders for guidance and solution. It is not only the money that matters, but the moral of the subjects, is to be lifted. The responsibility of the rulers comes first and the formost. Self discipline in the attitude of the leaders is counted the most..
We may go back in the past, as long as we wish; we will find that the lead taken up the persons in power, had always been follwed by the masses in general, and the results came faster and positively, and the crises is averted.
We review the example of Rani of Jhansi, she stood firmly against the British generals,which resulted in the start of 1857 war-spirit against them, people united and fought for the independence. Later on, in the last century, freedom fighters stood firm against the British rulers and that could spread up the message of courage in the country.
Mahatma Gandhi vowed to clad in one dhoti only to arouse a sense of equality with those who are poor, people laughed Gandhi’s decision, that what will be the economy or saving by the vow of a single man in the whole country. But his one step, united the whole country to have respect for have-nots and the oppressed.
Coming towards the current situation, in India, when Sonia Gandhi has appealed to his ministers to adopt the sense of austerity and savings, taken by the opposition as unrealistic or the drama, in the first instance, but it will result into a mass movement towards self disicipline and the moral upliftment among the ruling class as well as in the country as a whole to adopt the simple life and the good behaviour।
The chase to ministers to change in the mode of traveling, ordinary living will set the example for high thinking.
By:Shivraj Goyal.
559/1.S.V.Rd.Malad (W)400064
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Sunday, August 30, 2009
बीजेपी लीडर्स एंड जिन्नाह १९४७ में जिन्नाह का स्वर्गवास हो गया और उनको करांची में दफना दिया गया। वे इतने साल शान्ति से सो रहे थे । पाँच साल पहले, एक भजप्पा नेता हाथ में
कमल का फूल हाथ में लिए जिन्नाह साहब की कबर पर अपना आदर भेंट करने गए । जिन्नाह साहब आत्मा को वह आदमी और कमल की खुशबू दोनों बहुत ही पसंद आई और उनके भूत काल की आत्मा , वर्तमान काल में आ गई और भारतीय भाज्जप्पा लीडर के सर पर भूत बन कर सवार हो गई और उनकी जुबान एंट कर, ऐसे बयांन बाजी कर वाई की नेताजी पॉँच साल से सफाई देते फ़िर रहे हं की .... जिन्नाह साहब के भूत को भारती नेताओं का वर्तमान बहुत ही पसंद आया , और कमल की खुशबू इतनी प्यारी लगी की फ़िर से दूसरा भजप्पा नेता ढूंड और फिर उसके सर पर जिन्नाह का भूत चढ़ गया और जिन्नाह के भूत ने और इसका हाथ मरोड़ कर एक किताब ही लिखवा डाली । भूत या जिन्ह तो इस तरह भारती जनता नेता पर सवार हुआ की, नेता तो ख़ुद को हि फ़ना कर बैठा । अपना भूतकाल वर्तमानकाल भूल के जिन्नाह के भूत के साथ लग गया .वह रे जिन , वहा रे जिन्नाह । तू भविष्य न निगल , तू और के सर पर न बैठ , कमल का शौक छोड़ दे, किसी और का भविष्य न ख़राब कर, किसी और भाजप्ई का भविष्य न बिगाड़ । गलती तो हमारे नेताओ की हें की भारत के सपूतो के सर पर पाँव रख कर, विभाजन की दीवार के उस पार, देखते हें , चढ़ कर अपना भविष्य दांव पर लगाते हें । भारतियों के भविष्य की चिंता चिंतन छोड़, उधर के गडे मुर्दे उखाडा करते हें ।लेखक : शिवराज गोयल , ५५९/१,सवामी विवेकानंद सड़क , मलाड पश्चिम, मुंबई ४००४६४ भविष्य
कमल का फूल हाथ में लिए जिन्नाह साहब की कबर पर अपना आदर भेंट करने गए । जिन्नाह साहब आत्मा को वह आदमी और कमल की खुशबू दोनों बहुत ही पसंद आई और उनके भूत काल की आत्मा , वर्तमान काल में आ गई और भारतीय भाज्जप्पा लीडर के सर पर भूत बन कर सवार हो गई और उनकी जुबान एंट कर, ऐसे बयांन बाजी कर वाई की नेताजी पॉँच साल से सफाई देते फ़िर रहे हं की .... जिन्नाह साहब के भूत को भारती नेताओं का वर्तमान बहुत ही पसंद आया , और कमल की खुशबू इतनी प्यारी लगी की फ़िर से दूसरा भजप्पा नेता ढूंड और फिर उसके सर पर जिन्नाह का भूत चढ़ गया और जिन्नाह के भूत ने और इसका हाथ मरोड़ कर एक किताब ही लिखवा डाली । भूत या जिन्ह तो इस तरह भारती जनता नेता पर सवार हुआ की, नेता तो ख़ुद को हि फ़ना कर बैठा । अपना भूतकाल वर्तमानकाल भूल के जिन्नाह के भूत के साथ लग गया .वह रे जिन , वहा रे जिन्नाह । तू भविष्य न निगल , तू और के सर पर न बैठ , कमल का शौक छोड़ दे, किसी और का भविष्य न ख़राब कर, किसी और भाजप्ई का भविष्य न बिगाड़ । गलती तो हमारे नेताओ की हें की भारत के सपूतो के सर पर पाँव रख कर, विभाजन की दीवार के उस पार, देखते हें , चढ़ कर अपना भविष्य दांव पर लगाते हें । भारतियों के भविष्य की चिंता चिंतन छोड़, उधर के गडे मुर्दे उखाडा करते हें ।लेखक : शिवराज गोयल , ५५९/१,सवामी विवेकानंद सड़क , मलाड पश्चिम, मुंबई ४००४६४ भविष्य
Saturday, August 29, 2009
partition of india
For partition of India in 1947, the roles of the leaders of Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, as well as, the manifesto of labour party of Britain have to be studied well, before arriving at the opinion about fixing the responsibility of final decision for partition.
First and foremost, we have to go to the manifesto of labour party of Great Britain, who decided to end the extentionalism and the colonization under the Union Jack; and India was the first, on this agenda, to get the freedom by 1948. In 1946, the then British Prime Minister suggested to the Indian leaders to form a combined cabinet under the supervision of Governor-General of India, to have the experience of governing and to implement the plans of free India into the action and practice. Both the main political parties agreed to his suggestion and a combined cabinet was formed in 1946, which was known as Bombay plan or Roy cabinet. Three main ministries were agreed upon by Congres and the Muslim league leaders, viz., Prime Ministership, Home Ministery and Finance Ministery. Pandit Nehru was anonymously elected to Prime Ministership. Sadar Patel wanted to hold firm grip over the intelligence wing in India and to end the religious disharmony in the country, preferred Home Ministry, which was agreed upon by the Muslim League also, Muslim League leader of Punjab- Liyaquat Ali Khan agreed for the Finance Ministery.
Soon after this formation, Sadar Patel faced a great difficulty and hurdle of financial sanctions on each and every expenditures on the development plans and even for the appointments of the lowest posts. The Finance Ministry paralysed the working and the decisions taken by both the other two ministries. Hence, all the development promises made by the Indian congress leaders to the public at large, since 30 years, were not possible to be implemented.
Sadar Patel, who was a more practical man realized and sensed that the combination with Muslim League leaders in this cabinet and in the future rule cannot push India towards the developments and the well-beings of the masses. According to him, this opposition wing must form their own territory, and may rule as they liked.
Sardar Patel and Pandit Nehru had the twin thinking and did not opposed the partition, as Mahatma Gandhi and Abdul Kalam Azad did. Muslim Leagues leaders, namely, Mohammad Ali Zinnha, Sohrawardy, Liyaquat Ali Khan and Zaffruallah Khan took the best advantage of the situation, and put the heaviest pressure on Lord Mountbatten to recommend the partition, to the British Government, who had already made up her mind to grant India, its freedom, by1948.
Lord Mountbaten after resuming his duty in India in Jan.1947, wasted not even a single day, in formalities and parades and the guard of honors, but used every minute in meeting the leaders of Congress, League, Sikhs and Balochistan. He dragged the independence of India to Augt. 1947, instead of 1948, He strongly recommended to his bosses in London that the Indian part of the country may be handed over to Indian National Congress for Central rule, and the Pakistan to Muslim League leaders, with Mohammad Ali Zinnah, as its President.
Shri.V.P.Menon, the first home secretary to Sadar Patel, Johnson Compbell- the press attaché to Governor-General and the other independence era’s historians have written in length about the partition and its Architects, and had never held responsible or blamed any one of them (leaders) singularly for the partition.
Shivraj Goyal,
Studied largely Independence era history books & articles
First and foremost, we have to go to the manifesto of labour party of Great Britain, who decided to end the extentionalism and the colonization under the Union Jack; and India was the first, on this agenda, to get the freedom by 1948. In 1946, the then British Prime Minister suggested to the Indian leaders to form a combined cabinet under the supervision of Governor-General of India, to have the experience of governing and to implement the plans of free India into the action and practice. Both the main political parties agreed to his suggestion and a combined cabinet was formed in 1946, which was known as Bombay plan or Roy cabinet. Three main ministries were agreed upon by Congres and the Muslim league leaders, viz., Prime Ministership, Home Ministery and Finance Ministery. Pandit Nehru was anonymously elected to Prime Ministership. Sadar Patel wanted to hold firm grip over the intelligence wing in India and to end the religious disharmony in the country, preferred Home Ministry, which was agreed upon by the Muslim League also, Muslim League leader of Punjab- Liyaquat Ali Khan agreed for the Finance Ministery.
Soon after this formation, Sadar Patel faced a great difficulty and hurdle of financial sanctions on each and every expenditures on the development plans and even for the appointments of the lowest posts. The Finance Ministry paralysed the working and the decisions taken by both the other two ministries. Hence, all the development promises made by the Indian congress leaders to the public at large, since 30 years, were not possible to be implemented.
Sadar Patel, who was a more practical man realized and sensed that the combination with Muslim League leaders in this cabinet and in the future rule cannot push India towards the developments and the well-beings of the masses. According to him, this opposition wing must form their own territory, and may rule as they liked.
Sardar Patel and Pandit Nehru had the twin thinking and did not opposed the partition, as Mahatma Gandhi and Abdul Kalam Azad did. Muslim Leagues leaders, namely, Mohammad Ali Zinnha, Sohrawardy, Liyaquat Ali Khan and Zaffruallah Khan took the best advantage of the situation, and put the heaviest pressure on Lord Mountbatten to recommend the partition, to the British Government, who had already made up her mind to grant India, its freedom, by1948.
Lord Mountbaten after resuming his duty in India in Jan.1947, wasted not even a single day, in formalities and parades and the guard of honors, but used every minute in meeting the leaders of Congress, League, Sikhs and Balochistan. He dragged the independence of India to Augt. 1947, instead of 1948, He strongly recommended to his bosses in London that the Indian part of the country may be handed over to Indian National Congress for Central rule, and the Pakistan to Muslim League leaders, with Mohammad Ali Zinnah, as its President.
Shri.V.P.Menon, the first home secretary to Sadar Patel, Johnson Compbell- the press attaché to Governor-General and the other independence era’s historians have written in length about the partition and its Architects, and had never held responsible or blamed any one of them (leaders) singularly for the partition.
Shivraj Goyal,
Studied largely Independence era history books & articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)